Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Strange Man

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Strange Man

The Strange Man (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Self-published and does not have any coverage in reliable sources, thus failing the notability guidelines for books. See also Talk:The Strange Man. Flex (talk/contribs) 00:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletions. —A. B. ^(talk) 21:31, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete New author, no sources, completely non notable.scope_creep 00:57, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- I already had this tagged for deletion via PROD -- I'm not sure why we need to go through the AfD process. In any event, see the information I left about my notability search at Talk:The Strange Man. --A. B. ^(talk) 14:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - per nom. The article lacks any sort of sources that can establish notability and verifiability, at a moment's notice. Rudget _{Contributions} 18:06, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No indication of notability, no sources. Pigman^what?/trail 21:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete (unless sourced). Seems to be non-notable "vanity" publication (that's a term of art, no insult intended on integrity of the author) by non-notable author. I couldn't find sources to say otherwise; I doubt they exist.Wikidemo 21:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.