Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sim City Journal Union

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:33, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Sim City Journal Union

List of CJs (city journals - whatever they are) associated with SimCity 4. Each one is, I am sure, non-notable. A list of them is equally non-notable. -- RHaworth 08:04, 2 February 2006 (UTC) -- In that you would be mistaken at least 5 CJ's in the SCJU have recieved awards and honourable mentions from the two major heavyweights "Simtropolis" and "SimCity Central".

• Delete Yep, if you remove results for one particular forum: "sim city" "journal union" -simtropolis.com nets only 3 Google results —This user has left wikipedia 08:16 2006-02-02 - Considering it's only been present on the internet since mid July 2005, what would you expect. The website is even younger.
• Delete as per nom. --Merovingian {T C @} 08:17, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, only a single Google result. That goes with any other CJs or CJs list for that matter (per nom), except those actually garnering a sizable attention or controvesy from notable non-SimCity parties. ╫ ２５ ^{◀RingADing▶} 09:36, 2 February 2006 (UTC) ╫
• Delete--nixie 11:16, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The article had just been formed the day it was marked for deletion, so it wasn't done yet. Just wait and see what happens to it before you consider what to do with it.
• Merge If merged, the content would be part of Simtropolis, the list merged with that on SimCity 4, and then that moved to List of city journals. The delete option would also do the same.-TrackerTV 04:33, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. —Cleared as filed. 05:25, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• DeleteIn comparison to all items in an Encyclopedia, something like this is very irrevelvant. Thus, I strongly recommend it be deleted and merged with the original SimTropolis article. -AlabamaLlama 19:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The sites doling out awards to these guys may be notable, but their award recipients aren't. This is not an Emmy. Adrian Lamo · (talk) · (mail) · 20:14, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Honourbale? A whole bale of honor? Well ... I may have to reconsider my vote ... thinking about it ... nope, still delete. Adrian Lamo · (talk) · (mail) · 20:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment:1. Fixed spelling error. 2. Don't merge. Albeit SimTropolis has more of the CJs in the SCJU, there is one exclusive to SimCity Central and one that is mirrored on SCC from Simtropolis. By the way, SimCity Central IS getting an article today. -TrackerTV 23:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Changed vote: I am switching my vote to Merge. The content would become part of Simtropolis, the category dropped, and the list of CJs combined with that at SimCity 4 and then moved to List of City Journals, a new article. -TrackerTV 02:21, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per TrackerTV --Jelligraze 06:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• About the first search: The name is often abbreviated as SCJU. Over 19 out of 60 Google pages, only 24/285 possible were related to the SCJU. -TrackerTV 22:45, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.