Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shooting (Digital Short)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge with SNL Digital Shorts. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Shooting (Digital Short)
Non-notable Saturday Night Live sketch, no more notable than most of the other SNL Digital Shorts. Its only claim to fame appears to be that NBC didn't post it on YouTube - what? Since when was that an objective criterion of notability? Chardish (talk) 06:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Merge I suggest merging the fact that SNL didn't post this video to Youtube into either the SNL article or an article on either NBC, youtube or Hulu as it represents a business model shift related to these companies. It is not notable as a short, but I think it's an interesting footnote in the history of the involved companies.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 08:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 08:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Merge with SNL Digital Shorts Doc StrangeTelepathic MessagesStrange Frequencies 09:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- works for me I didn't realize the shorts had their own article.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 10:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep, the article looks too long to merge into the table in the SNL Digital Shorts article, and this particular short (and the parodies it spawned on YouTube) *was* covered by The New York Times. --Pixelface (talk) 10:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep (although I am fine with a merge) and move to The Shooting (SNL Digital Short). –thedemonhog talk • edits 16:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Merge with SNL Digital Shorts--nn. JJL (talk) 20:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Keep or Merge, strong anti-delete More information is better than less. Deletionists are almost always wrong. This is in fact a notable article for the reasons mentioned. burnte (talk) 09:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.