Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Saturnine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Strong Keep. Phgao 02:37, 21 October 2007 (UTC). W.marsh 14:04, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Saturnine

The Saturnine (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

See comments on AfD for Eric Hazebroek (uses self-citing websites, no outside sources, also coming up are other bands that fail notability guidelines) Phgao 10:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. Non-notable band, fails WP:MUSIC. Keb25 11:03, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep. Notable band, guitarist has deal with Mayones Guitars also. Bobsbasement 11:10, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
    Another person who does not sufficienly explain themselves, and looking at [1] does not seem to realise the guidelines for Wikipedia articles either. I suggest to closing admin to disregard him, even though RfA is not a vote. Phgao 07:07, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
    A major endorsement deal with Mayones Guitars is a notable thing. I suggest to closing admin to ignore Phgao Bobsbasement 06:17, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
    If you want me to go there, I will, I will refer any admins to [2] to see how reliable bob is. Phgao 06:47, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. the drummer plays with Bumblefoot (Guns'n Roses), guitarist plays with Stream of Passion, drummer has deal with Sabian, and S-Hoop. Eric Hazebroek 11:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
    Um, yes the drummer played with him, and I even can't find any proof of that as there are no sources cited in [3] nor can I find his name in [4], not to say that I don't believe you, but you need to give refs. Phgao 07:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep This band had released two albums and received positive reviews in the music press. This band also contains at least one member who was once a part of a notable band. --Siva1979Talk to me 12:03, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
    You might need to review that as the albums are self released as as such have no backing from any notable recording studio. POsitive reviews? You mean 2 reviews as one is double referenced, and if news press for you is a 3 paragraph 10 min job, or a user written review then that's ok. But clearly the news reviews are by nn websites that should not be cited. Phgao 07:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep This seems like a notable band to me. STORMTRACKER 94 14:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
    This is not a vote. Seems like does not cut it frankly, please either review what you have written or if you can't be bothered to have a decent look at the article, please refrain from commenting. Thank you for your consideration :) Phgao 07:05, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Neutral I could argue this one either way. Some of the members appear notable, but the whole recording output are 2 (self-released?) EPs, and I can't find much in the way of reliable sources, although there might be more in other languages. Too close to call. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep. Notable band, meets WP:MUSIC. Add more external sources perhaps. 203.220.107.23 07:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, biased nomination. --Sn0wflake 17:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.