The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Blatant single-source promotion of a consulting group, which usurped the term "Saint Index" and now heavily promotes itself wherever possible. `'юзырь:mikka 15:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Does not even site a source, needs to be heavily wikified, spam of the program, and it is orphaned. Hirohisat 16:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.