Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ronnie Williams Foundation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as promotional piece per WP:CSD#G11. --jonny-mt 07:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Ronnie Williams Foundation
Contested prod, where the prod reason was "Nonnotable foundation. Wikipedia is not a memorial" — my thoughts exactly. In addition, article is written (with classic COI tone) about the man, not the foundation (our article Ronnie Williams is a different Ronnie). Delete. ~EdGl (talk) 02:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. My sentiments exactly: it's spam in addition to being in breach of WP:NOT per nom. There is no sign of any third party coverage at all, and nothing in the article leads one to believe the person or the foundation are in any way notable. Ohconfucius (talk) 02:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as there appears to be no reliable sources to establish notability. (Google news gets nothing, and regular search only pulls up trivial coverage). The fact that the article is currently a coatrack / memorial doesn't help either. Bfigura (talk) 05:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as it's an ad/obituary(ish). Blatant advertising. So tagged. Undeath (talk) 06:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.