The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Robert 15:47, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
Content's got nothing to do with encyclopedias -- a bit of vanity, a bit of attention-getting, a whole lot of lack of notability all wrapped together in a package decorated with those golden arches. -- Captain Disdain 22:49, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. -- ��Captain Disdain 22:52, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
While this disdain fellow may be right, it is hillarious. -TFG
Delete, not encyclopedic. Rhobite 02:19, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
Delete, doesn't belong in wikipedia Crovax 04:43, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
Delete Doesn't belong anywhere. Saberwyn 05:51, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.