Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Romance Of Helen Trent
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep faithless (speak) 11:20, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Romance Of Helen Trent
Empty, no context, no explanation. An album article which contains nothing but a track list is not an encyclopedia article. My speedy tag was removed with no explanation and no notification. Corvus cornixtalk 05:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC) NOTE - Moved to The Romance of Helen Trent (album), since the capitalization of "of" was wrong, and there's an article already for the correct cap. —Torc. (Talk.) 07:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep It's an album for a notable band. Undeath (talk) 06:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - notability must be asserted; a link to the official site doesn't constitute an independent reliable source.--— TreasuryTag talkcontribs 07:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Keep, albums by notable bands are almost always themselves notable, there is heaps of precedent for this. However, I'm not all that convinced that The Killing Tree are notable. Keep for now, until the band's notability is established (or not). Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC).
- The Killing Tree is notable because it was created by Tim McIlrath from Rise Against. The album is now notable, source wise, with the sources I have provided. Undeath (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep The band is apparently notable, so the same applies to their album. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep meets notability. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 01:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ——Torc. (Talk.) 06:48, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - AMG review added. That should be sufficient. —Torc. (Talk.) 07:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
