Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rolling Stones (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete.  Denelson83  04:40, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] The Rolling Stones (film)

A film supposedly scheduled to be released a year from now, although "no studio has given the script the green light yet". No imdb page and the actors and producers are redlinks. Written by a youngster (as the tagline tells us, "the world's youngest filmmaker to date"). Not notable yet. HollyAm 00:10, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Flapdragon 00:30, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity, not a real film. User:Zoe|^(talk) 00:31, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable. There have been films made about the Stones notably Gimme Shelter and a new film about the death of Brian Jones called Stoned. However, there is no verifiable evidence of this film project either on Google or Google News. Capitalistroadster 00:39, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as above. Pintele Yid 00:39, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as a fabrication. Flowerparty■ 01:37, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. NN, no entry on IMDb. *drew 02:47, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as nonexistent film. Note that one of the proposed cast members is ALF. --Metropolitan90 02:51, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not a crystal ball or anything. — JIP | Talk 06:23, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, films that have not been given a green light by a studio cannot have a reliable scheduled release date. Also, I find it highly unlikely Daniel Radcliffe will have anything to do with it. He'll be filming December Boys in Australia starting "fittingly" in December and Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix will start filming in February. Given the fact that shooting Harry Potter usually takes around a year, a Christmas release of this film is quite impossible if he's a serious candidate. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:17, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above. NSLE _(讨论) \^<extra> 08:30, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Smells fake, certainly not verifiable. If real, deserves (at most) a sentence or two on the main Rolling Stones page until more finalized, not its own page. Turnstep 15:24, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. As stated above, a release date is scheduled late in the proceedings, not before a studio has even agreed to make the thing! If it's not a hoax it's titanic arrogance. - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 18:48, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No valid reason given for deletion, nonetheless, this does not look independently verifiable. Trollderella 19:28, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
  • The fact that there is no such movie is not a valid reason? User:Zoe|^(talk) 03:05, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.