Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rickrollerz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Rickrollerz

The Rickrollerz (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Contested Prod. Zero Google News hits. Questionable notability. -AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 15:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)


  • Delete as non-notable. (Perhaps a mention could be made in Rickroll if refs are found, although notability still not established.)  Frank  |  talk  16:05, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment Not enough on its own to show notability, but I did find this on the BBC Radio 1 blog about the band. StephenBuxton (talk) 16:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment Should have known from the edit summary - Curses! AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 16:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Absolutely no notability established per WP:BAND. Almost A7 material in my opinion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete for all the reasons above. Google brings up only 787 results, most of which are blogs...... Dendodge .. TalkHelp 16:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per the nominator does not meet WP:BAND and all that. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 18:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's pushing an A7 speedy to be honest, these guys are clearly not notable and it doesn't even really try to show otherwise. ~ mazca talk 20:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete No reliable sources and it does not seem any will cover them. Additionally, they have not had (and for the forseeable future it does not appear likely that they will) any kind of recording which will enter any chart. They would appear to be pushing the boat into A7 seas. --Hydraton31 (talk) 20:25, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment While the 'delete' type comments on this page are fairly well founded, and the page itself was very badly written, the track/act is actively in play at the moment - it is top 20 in the UK club charts and rising, widely play listed on UK national radio and is a contender for national chart placement. Probably classes as not notable yet, but a bit of a moving target. PeteMoore 18:27, 19 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.