Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Re-Advocate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE as nonnotable, etc. Rlevse 14:52, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Re-Advocate

The Re-Advocate (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A non-notable, bootleg mixtape that has no non-trivial coverage- just a track list. I am nominating these for the same notability issues:

  • Let The Game Begin
  • Aint No Game

Spellcast 14:28, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete all - Bootlegs don't deserve Wikipedia pages. --- Realest4Life 14:32, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep No need to delete, it contributes to the complete coverage of an artist and its work, expand instead. Emmaneul (Talk) 17:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
This can never be expanded from its current state and will never reach good or featured article status. There's no background info, critical reviews, chart positions, or any multiple non-trivial mentions of these tapes. "Non-trivial" meaning it's not the subject of anything beyond a mere track list. If it does even deserve to be mentioned here (which I don't think does), it should be listed in The Game discography at most. See also the deleted Snoop Dogg mixtapes at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welcome to tha chuuch mixtape vol.1. Spellcast 18:28, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
All of the above mixtapes (and more) are what I like to call DatPiff mixtapes. Anyone can take a few tracks and call them a mixtape and upload it to that website. Maybe you can add Born in the Bay to this list too. --- Realest4Life 18:59, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment WP:N says articles need "significant coverage" from sources that "address the subject directly in detail". There are only trivial sources (a track listing), so this is far from "significant coverage". Spellcast 16:45, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.