Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Punisher 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep because the nominator withdrew the nomination. -Royalguard11^TalkDesk 17:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Punisher 2

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Whispering^(talk/c) 17:18, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

• With substantial improvements to the article I'm withdrawing my nomination. Whispering^(talk/c) 13:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the article contains primarily speculative statements with no sources to verify. IMDB lists it as preproduction, and in scripting. If solid verifiable sources can be found, then I'll change to a keep. -- Whpq 17:38, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Well done ThuranX. The article is improved by a couple of magnitudes. -- Whpq 03:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete I fail to see why a future movie deserves an encyclopedia article. Akradecki 22:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. The article has been cleaned up and is a great example of how such an article should be written; hence the change in vote. That being said, though, I still don't really see how a future production really deserves to be in an encyclopedia. Akradecki 21:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This article needs a clean up, and there are a few editors, myself included, who have been working on cleaning up those future films with a comics theme to eliminate rampant rumors and force a high level of citation. I'll contact them to vote here and to focus on a cleanup there. ThuranX 23:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete little but unsourced rumors and original research. If ThuranX and others can improve it as outlined, I'll be happy to change my opinion to keep. Gwernol 00:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

  Switch to Keep following the significant improvements to this article in the last few hours. Well done. Gwernol 02:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per Whpq, with reservation. Keep per cleanup. Danny Lilithborne 00:22, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep As ThuranX indicated, the article needs a clean-up and valid documentation. The clean-up shouldn't be difficult; just needed to be brought to someone's attention. I'll see what I can do regarding an improvement. --Erik 00:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I was unsure at first, but X's drive and Erik's improvements have earned my vote. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 02:37, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Some great edits made since the nom. --Jamdav86 12:29, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It appears to be in order and well sourced. Spencer "The Belldog" Bermudez | (Complain here) 12:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep sourced, encyclopaedic. I'm not sure what else there even is WilyD 13:15, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• "Keep" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.29.227.4 (talk • contribs) .
• Comment: Hey, Decki, you should check out Spider-Man 3. Seriously, dude, open your mind. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 15:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.