Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Proportional Pirate Law

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g1, patent nonsense, also WP:SNOW. NawlinWiki 17:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Proportional Pirate Law

Disputed speedy. Nonsense, or at best original research. -- RHaworth 04:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. "The Proportional Pirate Law was created as a direct affront to the Inverse Ninja Law." Yep, nonsense all right. Fan-1967 04:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Consider MovingDelete This actually sounds alot like something that Maddox has said. I'll check it out, and if it is, maybe we should consider merging it with his article. Nevermind, it's just crap. Canuck90 04:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Gomu gomu no Delete Off the plank with ye. Danny Lilithborne 04:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Unreferenced. MER-C 04:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:BOLLOCKS -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 06:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • 0 ghits for "proportional pirate law" (when quoted). Potential speedy delete as nonsense, else delete. Seraphimblade 07:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:BOLLOCKS. The Inverse Ninja Law? Oh please... MartinDK 07:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • NO Delete maybe merge with pirate under the popular culture and fiction section? definitely no delete, there is some merit to it, look at pirates of the caribbean... Maybe merge with the pirates vs ninjas article? — 71.137.144.22 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Delete this is a joke item right? (also zero hits on MSN search engine)--Bilbo B 08:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete. As patent nonsense. Not to mention non-notable and unverifiable. Spinach Dip 08:51, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • If such an article can be written with reliable external third-party sources, week keep with a possible merge somewhere. If, I suspect, not, tactical nuke from orbit. -- saberwyn 08:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, though I have heard of the inverse ninja law: As the number of ninja in a group increases, their threat level decreases to 0. --humblefool® 10:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Shiver its timbers. Patent nonsense. --Folantin 12:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - The inverse ninja law I have heard of, this pirate stuff is nonsense. Chris Kreider 12:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Arrrrr. This little one'll make a tasty snack for the sharks, I be thinkin'. She's due for a nice bit of walkin' the plank, she is. Herostratus 14:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and WP:BJAODN. - Smerdis of Tlön 16:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.