Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Princeton Review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was OBVIOUS SPEEDY KEEP. Duh. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 06:33, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Princeton Review

delete, self promoting site that is irrevelant especially when it comes to alexa's rank. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wannabebritney (talk • contribs)

• Speedy keep. Obviously, the AfD was vandalism. (Definitely a notable corp.) --Karnesky
• Speedy Keep, no issues presented. Monicasdude 22:29, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep per above. Ardenn 22:30, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• /<eep. --Myles Long 22:53, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep this is a publicly-traded corporation (NASDAQ: REVU), with some $100 million in annual sales. 68.78.123.171 23:46, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep of course. Carlossuarez46 00:08, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. For reasons above. Nominator's first and so far only 5 edits consisted of a revert to ambition and this AfD; that's a little fishy. Ikkyu2 00:45, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • And the "revert" to ambition was itself reverted as inappropriate. Fishy is as fishy does. Ikkyu2 00:47, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The article is about a company, not a website - the relevant standard is WP:CORP, not the Alexa test. Reviewing the article, it seems a little promotional in spots but that's resolved through editing, not deletion. The nomination does appear to be more than a bit suspicious. Rossami (talk) 01:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per all above. The AfD has to be either vandalism or a bad joke. --Kinu 01:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep. It seems as if Wannabebritney didn't get into the college of her choice. -- Wikipedical 02:33, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.