Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pokemon Tower

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. JIP | Talk 07:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Pokemon Tower

Fancruft, no useful information. I tried to put a WP:PROD tag on, but it was deleted Kungfu Adam (talk) 19:20, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete "is a large pokemon fanfiction and fanart website" WP:NOT. --Porqin 19:23, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • On the tag it said we can remove it. My bad if thats not what it meant. I got confused.

And it depends on your idea of useful. If your someone looking for a site with fanfiction on it then it it is useful for them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RCF (talk • contribs)

    • If you remove a prod tag, then you need to explain why the prodded reason is wrong. --TheFarix (Talk) 21:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Vanity article and advert. --TheFarix (Talk) 21:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry I'm new to this I didn't know.

  • That sounds cool. What can I do?
  • Re-judge After performing a cleanup and leaving out all of the vanity content, I feel the article is in need of a re-judgement on it. Also on User:Porqin's comment, what about the article for fanfiction.net then? -- (十八|talk) 14:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Article doesn't assert notability and with a google test of 633 hits and a page rank of 4, it doesn't meet WP:WEB --TheFarix (Talk) 00:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom —Minun Spiderman 10:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Re-judge I made a small cleanup. The article is now concise and informative. Citations are difficult because the website is constructed with a windowed format using HTML so direct links are hard. TheFarix: On the subject of WP:WEB when Pokemon Fanfiction is typed into the google search bar it is the first link to come up. It was also the first for AskJeeves and MSN and the second for Yahoo.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Talv (talk • contribs)
  • Delete per WP:WEB. In response to the previous vote, that doesn't qualify under the criteria. Anyway, anything made by fans is considered fancruft and that could not be incorporated as a basis of notability into the article. PCEevee talk 20:55, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.