Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Plume of Feathers, Loughton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Plume of Feathers, Loughton

The Plume of Feathers, Loughton (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable pub. Borderline speedy as no assertion of importance. Masaruemoto 04:31, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - If anyone thinks that it has any notability, they can recreate it as a serious, non comedy article. digitalemotion 07:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Digital Emotion (talk • contribs)
• Delete per nom. Punkmorten 09:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete if its biggest claim to fame is that it stayed open until 1am on St Patrick's Day then I think it is safe to say it fails WP:NOTE • nancy • 12:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. If we had articles on every public house, Wikipedia would be hopelessly overloaded and there is nothing to suggest that this is more notable than any other. Article is almost humourous in terms of WP:OR - I mean how we'd ever find a reliable source to verify that "Recently a courageous young barmaid has taken to stealing K-man's woolly hat. This sort of activity tends to be received in great humour by everybody except K-man himself - everybody else really hates that hat - who usually responds by muttering under his breath and miming a rifle to shoot her with. At this point the Friends resume ignoring him: he is done entertaining them for the evening"... --h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 12:54, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Well, it's got "a new and improved condom machine" - doesn't that make it notable? Only joking - delete of course. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 23:02, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete A pub much like thousands of other pub. Not notable. --Malcolmxl5 01:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.