Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Plazoid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Petros471 13:58, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Plazoid

This entire article only links back to a blog, and I'm not sure some guy's blog is article worthy. I hesitate to call this a vanity page, but there's not proof this 'zine even exists except for the blog. Even if the 'zine does exist, does every photocopied leaflet put out in the world deserve an article? The talk page leads me to think that this article is largely the work of one annonymus user, perhaps the blogger himself. BoosterBronze 19:08, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Not-notable. This article and The Arcata Eye have been the centerpoint of an ongoing squabble, so this AfD may be a bumpy ride. - Richfife 20:18, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom - a google turns up no sources of interest. --Charlesknight 21:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete But I may be a bit biased (at least according to the anonymous editors who are obvious Plazoid supporters). Some history: I actually created the Plazoid page, because a set of anonymous editors (who I believe are the creators or close associates of the Plazoid blog and zine) kept manipulating Arcata Eye related material in order to push the Plazoid. I figured they would be happier with their own entry. In any case, this "edit war" hasn't been active since early spring, since the anonymous editors who are pushing the Plazoid seem to have disappeared, at least for the moment. So that may not be an issue any longer. Also, the blog itself has severely tanked recently and I think the few people in Arcata who actually read it have turned elsewhere. --Metatree 21:41, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.