Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Planet Cachexial

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge with Nuclear Death.  RasputinAXP  c 14:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Planet Cachexial

Not as controversial as some of my other nominations (I think !!!) Fails WP:MUSIC and if it is a WP:HOAX then it is one of the better efforts I've seen ! 10 ghits DavidHumphreysSPEAK TO MEABOUTTHE THINGS I MESSED UP 02:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Merge to Nuclear Death there is plenty of room in that article for the album descriptions. --Brad101 04:10, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Does the author know what bestiality means? --Xrblsnggt 04:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Maybe it has something to do with the record label ... Cat`s Meow Records ... possibly the record label was screwing them ??? DavidHumphreysSPEAK TO MEABOUTTHE THINGS I MESSED UP 04:28, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm going to guess that the author meant something else by it. (I hope.) Fan-1967 05:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Think it's something related to the band, as there is also this DVD: Nuclear Bestiality. Maybe they thought the word sounded funny... -- Koffieyahoo 07:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge as non-notable album by only slightly-notable band, mention it in the band's article and be done with it. -- H·G (words/works) 05:15, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect: Getting any album to have a solo article was a big VfD fight. Then it was "significant cultural milestones like Let it Bleed." Then hordes of small albums by routine bands began forming a queue to come through the door. The point is that albums are not automatically individual articles. It's closer to the other way. Each article has to give us reasons for its existence, must make its claims, and albums are no different. This one fails. Geogre 11:48, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I wonder, has anyone brought up the fact that the project page at WP:ALBUM contains no notability standards? How is an editor to know what albums are considered acceptable for articles? When you add in all of the information laid out in the project (track listing, personnel, etc), any album article is going to look odd inserted in the middle of the band's article. --Aguerriero (talk) 17:14, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.