Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Photon Belt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as nonnotable bollocks. Sandstein 16:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Photon Belt

The Photon Belt (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

It's WP:BOLLOCKS. Leibniz 17:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

• It is also a bit disappointing. I thought a Photon Belt would be something to accessorize your Tinfoil hat with. Leibniz 20:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete big SHINY bollocks ➥the Epopt 17:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Complete and total bollocks. WP is not the place for pointless myths. --Sable232 18:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Neutral/weak delete If it's been referenced enough, even nonsense is worthy of an article. But if nobody's bothered to publish a "this is nonsense" article about it, it's not worth having a Wikipedia article about. Note that WP:BOLLOCKS is not official WP policy. --Alvestrand 21:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Super Delete FirefoxMan 22:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• New age OR nonsense, delete. - ∅ (∅), 22:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but clearly mark as unscientific statement based on pseudo-religious believes. Alf photoman 23:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with one of those articles about newage hippy apocalypse people that drink kool aid. Anomo 04:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep -- notable woo from the early to mid 1990s. Added a reference to a Cecil Adams column that discusses it. Haikupoet 04:21, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Single source, the other reference cited is a book sales link from Amazon.com (spam link?) and a debunking page. Fails notability (even for this sort of hokum) and WP:V (what little there is). I too am disappointed that I cannot accessorize this with my tinfoil hat, good entry for WP:BAD --Eqdoktor 06:54, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Bollocks, pretty undocumented, and not even particularly funny. Goochelaar 12:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.