Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Perfect cube

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 21:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Perfect cube

The Perfect cube (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Vanity. I suspect non-notability because google does not lead me to any third party reiviews of the scupture. Whosasking 00:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep I'm not convinced that this article should be deleted, although I can understand the non-notability claim.--Phill talk Edits 09:41, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - appears to have OR problems as well as the COI noted in the nom. -- BPMullins | Talk 13:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Does have problems with OR and has absolutely zero sources, reliable or otherwise. Also is written in a self-promotional tone and may well be a vanity page. Arkyan • (talk) 15:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep: Would like to keep but only if WP:A since this certainly is WP:OR. If fleshed out, great. If not, trash. Christopher Jost 17:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete Individual works of art should get articles only if there are truly sources. I suppose the images could go to wikiCommons. DGG 23:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Interesting, but unfortunately, no indications of notability. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Move to Matt Hope Merge this with Horn Massive, let the guy have a stub with a link to his own site. Ventifax 04:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete absolutely no citations. This is a vanity page (see the history) and has all of the pitfalls that come with it. --JianLi 21:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Can we add Horn Massive to this AfD? It's also a vanity page by the same author. --JianLi 21:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.