Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Panda Candies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete a7, does not assert notability per WP:BAND. NawlinWiki 21:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Panda Candies

The Panda Candies (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable band; fails the music notability criteria. Article lacks sources. Probably runs afoul of the conflict of interest guidelines, too. Article was tagged with prod, which was removed by Mikemaciss. --Slowking Man 06:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - 11 ghits outside of myspace. Fails WP:MUSIC. MER-C 07:36, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per non-notable band and per WP:DUMB (yes, even if 50 people bought their album!). I counted 3 ghits, two from the same site. Sorry guys, you're just notable. -Patstuart^{(talk)(contribs)} 10:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as a local band, fails WP:MUSIC. You know, you could have just tagged it with {{db-bio}}. Michaelas10 (Talk) 12:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

  This is not {{db-band}} material, because the article asserts notability by saying what the band have recorded. MER-C 14:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete I think that this is a speedy delete candidate as the article has no sources and references to back any of its assertions up; the band has no notable members; has not toured nationally; has not released albums or singles on either a major label or a major indie label; has had no chart success in any country and hasn't been featured in any mainstream music publication or other Journal of Record - all criteria in WP:Music. This is better off on Myspace until any of the above can be satisfied with reliable sources. Tagged thusly. (aeropagitica) 18:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.