Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Other Sister

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 04:52, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Other Sister

I think thier should be the reason why i cannot keep this article.User:Newyorkcatwhite

• Strong keep - Film starring recognised A-listers. Grutness...wha? 00:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep if, for no other reason, the nomination does not articulate any sort of reason for deletion. Regardless, internationally released film with notable stars. Otto4711 00:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Obvious KEEP why is this even up for deletion? --Xiahou 00:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. - Walkiped ^{(T | C)} 01:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep and cancel this AfD as BF nom, one of a series of weird nonsense edits today by this editor. Tubezone 01:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep Bad faith nomination. And block user. Edits are nothing but vandalism: [1] Wavy G 03:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep - bad faith probable vandal. SkierRMH,07:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• KEEP Overall I found it to be good article, thank you for your time. Rcehoppe 08:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.