Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ordertaker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WjBscribe 03:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Ordertaker

The Ordertaker (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Found while patrolling candidates for speedy deletion. The given reason was: {{db-band}}. This is not a valid speedy reason as this is not a band, but rather a single released by a band. As this is a procedural nomination, I am neutral. —— Eagle101^{Need help?} 08:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

This article is about a song. There are lots of song articles on Wikipedia. This song is no less important than many other songs which have articles. I see no reason why it should be deleted. -KingpinE7 21:09, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

• Keep the Speedy Delete nomination was applied by a relatively new user who has gone on a blitz of attempted deletions without much regard for policy. As with KingpinE7 I don't see why this one is singled out (no pun intended). ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 16:55, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep — It is a single released by a notable band (although the article about the band could be much better sourced). --Paul Erik 04:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.