Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Open Organization Of Lockpickers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 01:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Open Organization Of Lockpickers

The Open Organization Of Lockpickers (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This should be speedy deleted as A7, but Phaedriel who had previously deleted under that criteria, undeleted herself for some reason, so I'm posting here. It's just a non-notable small lockpicking group. Only source is their website. Absolutely zero information about the group, other than it exists: the remainder of the article is about lockpicking on TV and on "legal concerns in the netherlands". This clearly should go. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 19:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete. No assertion of notability. HeirloomGardener 04:41, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment I have now edited the article to include an assertion of notability. JulesH
  • Strong keep -- these people brought the practice of lock bumping to the public attention, which was a fairly important breakthrough in lockpicking technique. See [1] for more info. JulesH 12:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong keep --I disclose that I am primary author of the article/entry TOOOL. If my style of creating the article and placing the information is not up to scratch then please help by suggesting/contributing. It would be a shame to let a decent article/stub get deleted just because it was not developed to better/higher standards immediately. There are a number of news/media coverage both on print and TV but I am still trying to get my hands on the exact reference data. -Deepraj | Talk 18:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.