Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ongar Experiment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 16:17, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Ongar Experiment

Appares to be an April Fool's hoax: see Talk:The Ongar Experiment -- Karada 07:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete hoax. Danny Lilithborne 10:06, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Article looks like a hoax to me; user's only other contributions were two articles that are now copyvios and a POV edit to a television presenter's page. --Elkman - ^(talk) 15:23, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. SorryGuy 18:54, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• 'Delete per above -- getcrunkjuice^contribs 22:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Do not Delete. Dr Lazlo Pozsgay was a real doctor. My mother was a nurse at the Fyfield Clinical Research Institute and had fond memories of this rather odd man. Dr Pozsgay returned to Hungary at the time of the 1957 uprising and did not return. I myself am now a Doctor and the article is medically correct (more or less). I suspect the writer is not a doctor. I would be interested to know what efforts the other contributors to this discussion have made to verify Dr Pozsgay's work beyond doing a Google search against his name – believe it or not, there is a whole word of knowledge out there that is not on the internet. With thanks Dr John Keyes. 15:33, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The stuff about Hungary checks out. The medical stuff is in the ball-park if a little short on detail - people have been know to appear significantly younger as consequence of surgery. Overall the article is too boring and obscure to be a hoax. Who would bother making it up? Lansdale 00:01, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless verified. Stifle (talk) 20:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.