The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete (as nonsense) --Nlu 08:05, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Delete - non-encyclopedic JoJan 20:13, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Delete as non-encyclopedic. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Delete as original research, unverifiable, insufficient context, and probably a copyvio too by the looks of it. — HaelethTalk 22:46, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Delete, as the users above me reason. Croat Canuck 05:46, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.