Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New York Ripper

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kpet - SimonP 03:24, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] The New York Ripper

unneccessary page, lack of content UkPaolo 15:45, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

• leepl has been expanded and improved since the first version Dunc|☺ 17:30, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Rewritten although I don't feel strongly about this article and a Merge & redirect to Lucio Fulci could be appropriate. Soundguy99 17:33, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep a minor movie, but seems like an okay aricle to me--Sophitus 18:22, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - DS1953 23:07, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Lucio Fulci. A minor film. Megan1967 09:51, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
• Strong keep. Notable. —Xezbeth 09:56, May 31, 2005 (UTC)
• 'keep please no reason for deleting it Yuckfoo 16:12, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, wide-release commercial films are I think inhererently notable, even if "minor"; no particular need to merge.--Pharos 08:22, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to Lucio Fulci. JamesBurns 09:12, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep a quite notable fulci film. but if it exists, so should several other fulci films which don't have articles - Niz 21:48, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.