Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Morning Of

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, coverage found in reliable sources during AFD appears to establish notability meeting WP:MUSIC. Davewild (talk) 08:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Morning Of

The Morning Of (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Makes a couple of claims, but none are enough to satisfy WP:MUSIC. SmartPunk and PureVolume are not major record charts, so those claims certainly don't qualify under criterion #2. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:47, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete No notability, failing WP:MUSIC and WP:BAND. Jmlk17 05:44, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep, was able to find a couple of what appear to be third-party sources for this band: ([1], [2]). Could be enough to tip them over the WP:N line. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:30, 18 March 2008 (UTC).
  • Keep. The Times Herald-Record article that Lankiveil found is sufficient, I think - band passes on coverage (the two articles) and the tour that's mentioned in the article. There's also a (short) bio and a review at allmusic [3], [4]. --Michig (talk) 13:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC)...and a couple more reviews:[5], [6].--Michig (talk) 13:30, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- DoubleBlue (Talk) 01:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - Definitely adheres to WP:MUSIC - band has received coverage and reviews in secondary sources, especially allmusic guide which is generally considered notable. The other articles are either borderline and meet criteria sufficiently. Wisdom89 (T / C) 03:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.