Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mill Garden
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep and Expand, so tagged. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Mill Garden
- Delete nn public garden = city park? or privately owned like public houses, whichever this one isn't notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:41, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete It's a rubbish article, haven't got anymore info on it so delete if you want. Cls14 (talk) 21:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NN. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 00:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 14:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Keep and expand. - Is the subject of multiple secondary reliable sources that are independent of the subject [1][2][3], the core criterion of WP:NOTABILITY. It is listed by the Gateway Gardens Trust as a "Historic Park and Garden" --Oakshade (talk) 02:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite 23:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted due to multiple sources added by User:Oakshade. Black Kite 23:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - "Historic Park and Garden" title imparts notability. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 02:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Plenty of WP:RS coverage available to establish notability and expand the article. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
