Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The LiveWire (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein (talk) 07:43, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The LiveWire

The LiveWire (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Image:Riyanaandaeden.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Image:Lw news split.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Image:The Revival on The LiveWire.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Image:LiveWireLogo.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

A show, still not even airing yet, and almost certainly not passing WP:NOTABILITY. Jmlk17 07:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:N. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 11:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Per nom. With option to re-create if RS are found. Twenty Years 15:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Go ahead, delete it, it's not the only article of it's type and there are many more articles with little nobility and less infomation that I've put into this one. --Thewizkid93 22:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Reply If you could take the time to add those articles to WP:Afd, your efforts would be greatly appreciated. -Verdatum 22:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete It looks like a fairly decently written and sourced article comparitively speaking. But I fail to see how a Community television show satisfies notability. If it were a nationwide commercial production, I'd say keep it. -Verdatum 22:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Reply Shows produced by RMITV are looked up on WIkipedia quite a lot as it is a way of prople becoming aware of the show. I know that I often use Wikipedia as a tool for finding out about community TV shows as most show's websites arn't that descriptave.--Thewizkid93 06:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Reply And this is potentially fine. But, A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. So if you can find an article published by an established newspaper or other similar source, and reference it in the article, I'll gladly change my vote. I tried quickly, but the most I could find was an announcement on the RMITV website, which would not be considered independent of the subject. -Verdatum 07:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. —Longhair\^talk 22:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- this show has been in pre-production for a long while now. Nothing has ever come of the promises the article makes / once made. Created by an editor with a clear COI also. - Longhair\^talk 22:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unreferenced for pretty much a year, community tv show which does not seem to have produced more than a pilot. Does not seem to meet WP:N, WP:FICTION or WP:MOVIE to me and I'm not sure if there is anything else more appropriate.Garrie 03:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.