Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lie Evolution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. - Bobet 10:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Lie Evolution

Adds nothing to the debate or controversy - it says nothing not already said. Interested2 16:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep if the book has been published. Just because its not a new story doesn't mean the book should be ignored. Links could be tidied to remove POV though. Nuttah68 17:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per Nuttah68. -- Whpq 18:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per Nuttah68. With a subject like this, though, care must be taken not to violate WP:NPOV. Scorpiondollprincess 19:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Ken Ham and mention there. Nothing in this book that doesn't slide seemlessly into Ham's article. -- GWO
• keep please and remove any unneutral points of view Yuckfoo 19:42, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.