Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Legend of Drizzt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was REDIRECT to Drizzt Do'Urden. -Splash - tk 20:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Legend of Drizzt

The Legend of Drizzt (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod. This article has insufficient content, primary or reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability of this book. Gavin Collins 08:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect to Drizzt Do'Urden and cover this in the Literature section, as it's just a reordering/republishing of the existing books about Drizzt. Gavin, did you even read the article or any of the things it links to before writing this nomination? The first line says "is a series of fantasy novels", and yet you say "... to demonstrate notability of this book", as if it were a single book of questionable notability, when really it's a new collective name given to some of the most notable fantasy series of the last twenty years. Nominations like this are what make it seem like you just wander through D&D-related categories, look at the bottom of an article, and go "hey, no links here, I should take this to AfD". Pinball22 20:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

• Comment I did indeed read the "article", which comprises of only 3 sentences and imparts less information than the AfD template. I quote: "The book combines the internal conflict of Drizzt's continence ...." I assume the 3 novels have been published compendium, but the source of this statement is not cited. If I am mistaken, it is because I assumed the author of this article know what he was taking about. --Gavin Collins 17:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. I'm not saying it's a great article... like I said, it just needs to be a redirect. Yes, that last line says "book", but the other two clearly state that it incorporates multiple series. You've agreed in the past to do some research before nominating things for AfD, yet in this case you obviously didn't even bother to click the links within the article, Google the title, or make any other minimal effort to figure out what the article was about. Pinball22 14:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect to Drizzt Do'Urden#Literature, what little content this article contains is already there. --Stormie 05:18, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect per Pinball22. Rray 02:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect per Pinball22. Edward321 04:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.