Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ken Baldwin Show

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:11, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Ken Baldwin Show

Page for an internet radio show, created by User:KenBaldwin. Contested prod. Oddly enough, gets an extraordinary number of google hits, but only the first handful seem relevant. Seems like non-notable vainty unless proven otherwise. Delete. Grandmasterka 02:36, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

The show is in the embryonic state. We really like Wikipedia so we thought we would start an article. If it is to soon we would not mind a delete at this time. We can always start an article after the show builds up a little bit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KenBaldwin (talk • contribs)

That would be fine, but I'm in over my head I got lost reading the speedy deletion link!

  • Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete The subject of the article needs to be notable before the article is created, rather than to have an expectation to become notable once the article comes in to existence. How many dead student bands would have articles here if that was the criteria for inclusion? Best to build up a reputation before creating an article.  (aeropagitica)  05:54, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, vanity. --Terence Ong 11:01, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, vanity, nn, probably Speedy per author / subject above. What the hell is up with that google search? Deizio 16:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Yesterday, it got about 3 million hits. Today, the same link gets 45. Go figure. Grandmasterka 03:47, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per KenBaldwin. Lbbzman 21:25, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I don't discount it for being an Internet show. I have to discount it because it is a planned Internet show with no other substantial link. : ( Lonesomedovechocolate 02:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete promotional material. Fishhead64 05:10, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom -- Argon233 T @ C  U ∠  06:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Royboycrashfan 12:57, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ship high in transit

Dates show it wasn't an April 1 joke, but one had to wonder. Not even a good joke. Moriori 02:53, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Move to Redirects for deletion. Alba 03:10, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete joke Tony 04:21, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per Tony. --Khoikhoi 05:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • BJAODN as simple as that. --Terence Ong 11:02, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Delete' joke. Lonesomedovechocolate 02:43, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete bad joke. --Bachrach44 19:27, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete scatalogical humor --MrFizyx 22:44, 6 April 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.