Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Juggernaut Bitch (3rd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was AfD closed early. Review on-going at Wikipedia:Deletion_review#The_Juggernaut_Bitch and this AfD was a result of miscommunication. Wait until DR is finished for further action. -lethe talk + 06:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Juggernaut Bitch
This is directly following the discussion at Deletion review - the article was undeleted, but it said that it was currently going through an AFD. I cannot see where that AFD is, but since there are many editors who voted to undelete it, I won't revert Tawker's action outright. Instead, I'm bringing it back here again. As this is mostly procedural, no vote (yet). Titoxd(?!? - help us) 05:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Unencyclopedic. I realize that many might not agree, but we have to consider this: is Wikipedia an encyclopedia or not? If it is to be truly an encyclopedia, this material doesn't belong as it has no redeeming scholastic value. --Nlu (talk) 05:54, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy keep -- This article is still going through VFD and has been restored by Tawker teomporarily Mineralè 06:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment see Wikipedia:Deletion_review#The_Juggernaut_Bitch can't put it up for afd until this is finished yet Mineralè 06:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
