Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jawa Report

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 00:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Jawa Report

Fails to meet any of the criteria at WP:WEB. BhaiSaab ^talk 00:31, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page because it is an article on a section of the website:

• Karnival of the Koran Krappings
• Delete per nom. 24.184.9.179 03:07, 30 July 2006 (UTC)Dark Shikari 03:08, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn blog/personal site per WP:WEB. --MCB 06:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom as a non-notable website. --Bigtop 06:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom, nn site. rootology 08:16, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. SynergeticMaggot 09:21, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both as non-notable websites. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 15:39, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both per nom. —C.Fred (talk) 21:33, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Karnival of the Koran Krappings because that particular "carnival" has resulted in numerous DDOS attacks and is well-known among Islamic message boards. It's also the reason why the website itself was blocked in India. For that reason, I do think it's notable. It does need cleaning up, to link to news about the DDOS attacks and the Indian internet block. Otherwise, make it a section under The Jawa Report. Keep The Jawa Report entry because it is a major weblog that is frequently the source of breaking and/or exclusive news related to terrorist acts. --Beth C. 22:52, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: That's a questionable claim. Wouldn't others have sourced this blog in the past if it's such a great source? BhaiSaab ^talk 01:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both Definitely fail WP:WEB. Jean-Philippe 23:27, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete A blog? non-notable. -Royalguard11^Talk 01:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.