Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jason Giambi Curse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, original research, non-notable, etc. —Verrai 13:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Jason Giambi Curse

The Jason Giambi Curse (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article has no sources and reeks of original research. Seems to be a non-notable neologism. Delete as nom. Michael Greiner 01:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete as uninteresting coincidence. SolidPlaid 01:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and the fact that I have never even heard of this, and I watch a lot of Sportscenter.
    Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 01:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as sheer OR. GlassCobra 01:32, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per everything said above. — Wenli (reply here) 01:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. This supposed "curse" is merely an artifact of unusually high expectations among Yankee fans, or at least the unusually high expectations of the editor who created this article. --Metropolitan90 01:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep lest we all be afflicted by this curseDelete WP:OR, WP:V, unreferenced neologism. SkierRMH 03:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • "Delete Interesting read, but unfortunately it violates original research, and verifiability policies. --Hdt83 Chat 03:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment I cleaned up the article and added the only source I could find. Still, this should probably be deleted. faithless (speak) 04:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per everyone. Maxamegalon2000 05:46, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:OR Chris! ct 05:47, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - original research and nonsense. Seven years is not a long time to not win a World Series. --skew-t 06:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.