Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jar (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 01:45, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Jar

The Jar (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This article was previously deleted here. I maintain that this is a non-notable webcomic, I doubt it has been reviewed by reliable third party sources. I have also contacted the admin who undeleted the article here about my concerns for the article. But I really do not think it can be saved. - Hahnchen 01:40, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:WEB and WP:RS, or possibly redirect to Sparkling Generation Valkyrie Yuuki.--TBCΦtalk? 02:24, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, perhaps add a note about it to SGVY's page. --humblefool® 03:21, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia; its strength is that it holds information on things that no other encyclopedia does. Famous works of art are in Encyclopedia Britannica; not so famous are in Wikipedia. I say this as a historian (no, really, I am one): wikipedia could be an amazing source for historians of the future. But not if it plays fast and loose with the delete button. This comic existed, it had readers, it is worthy of inclusion. By deleting an article on some arbitrary standard of "notable", you are destroying future historical records. *jb 23:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - You exist. You probably have acquaintances. You are destroying future historical records by not detailing your personal life on a Wikipedia page. Oh wait, I'm being facetious. - Hahnchen 02:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Avi 22:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and TBC. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. WMMartin 21:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. The original decision at the first AFD still applies as well since apparently not much has changed. RFerreira 05:15, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.