Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Initiation of Sarah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:06, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Initiation of Sarah

A few short sentences of speculation about a TV Movie of the Week that may air in October, crystal-ballism. Erik the Rude 01:52, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Seems basically verifiable, found some news about it via Google News. Official page, IMDB page... no reason to doubt the article. "Crystal ball" just refers to reporting rumors and outright conjecture as fact, or having an article with nothing but speculation. This movie seems to be have announced and is in production and will air in 10/06... no reason to delete the article. --W.marsh 01:57, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- it's a remake of the 1978 TV movie, as mentioned on IMDB and not in this stub of an article. Seems pretty non-notable. BuckRose 02:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It needs to be expanded, but there is no reason to delete it. Just because it's a TV movie doesn't mean it should be deleted. There are plenty of articles about TV movies, just look at all the articles at List of Television Movies. Yes it needs to be expanded, but it should be kept. MasterGreenLantern 02:25, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, looks entirely legit, and has a decently notable cast, too. Crystal ballism is for unverifiable stuff, not this. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 11:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Even if the 2006 movie by this name ends up not being released (unlikely, as I'm sure it's fairly far along production-wise) there's a late 70s film by the same name which could go under this title. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:52, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand, TV films do assert notability. --Terence Ong 14:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It's not crystal ball to report current facts about upcoming events. ScottW 14:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per W.marsh Crazynas 15:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete ridiculous to have an article on this nonnotable remake of a TV movie

Bwithh 19:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep and expand, the problem is that it needs more info, but the fact it is a stub is not a reason for deletion. --Wisden17 23:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.