Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Idiom Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 16:56, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Idiom Magazine

The Idiom Magazine (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

By own admission, underground, given away a free in a local community. Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 19:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. 24 Google hits equals not being notable. Bigtop 20:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: In fact, when you go to theidiommag.com, there is a link that says to click the mag link and leads to a 404 error. Bigtop 20:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: I'm the one who made the article. What can I do to change it to make it acceptable? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skier6770 (talk • contribs).
    • Reply You could supply references showing the magazine has been discussed in reliable sources and is notable in contrast to other magazines of its type. If a topic is not notable, however, there is little that can be done to make an article compliant. --Dhartung | Talk 01:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, not a notable publication. --Dhartung | Talk 01:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. Also, is that supposed to be a copyright notice at the bottom of the article? Maxamegalon2000 06:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable and appears to be unverifiable as well. Shimeru 09:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.