Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hunted (Visual Outbreak)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MaxSem 12:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Hunted (Visual Outbreak)

The Hunted (Visual Outbreak) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This film fails to be notable per Wikipedia's notability guidelines. A Google search with the title and the writers' names for the keywords show only two other links besides Wikipedia links. As a result, there is no indication that this film has received multiple and significant coverage by reliable sources. The film also does not have a listing at the Internet Movie Database, which would be a step toward notability. Basically, it has nonexistent presence outside its official site and Myspace blog. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per lack of notability as shown by a lack of an IMDb page and only two other Google hits. Alientraveller 17:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete If there's a Myspace page as an "official website", the "official trailer" is a video on Youtube, and no mention on IMDB or Google, then this one is definitely NN. NASCAR Fan24(radio me!) 18:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete or change Content to 2003 film with the same title. The IMDB page (http://imdb.com/title/tt0269347) is for a 2003 film. This is a 2008 film with the same name. The 2008 film is not on IMDB; therefore not notable. --Anthony5429 19:25, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
  • The 2003 film exists here: The Hunted (2003 film). This AfD'd article doesn't comply with naming conventions for films, anyway. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:27, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete. Non-notable vanity amateur film. Keb25 04:51, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. This film is in the process of being made and is a large project by a locally notable short film director. As it is still in development, IMDB articles / official sites are still pending. --CumQuaT 14:04, 12 October 2007 (EST) — CumQuaT (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • "Locally notable" doesn't cut it, especially when you're not referring to the film. I'm locally notable where I live, but I don't pursue an article for myself. You need to make a case for existing notability -- if it doesn't exist yet, the article shouldn't exist yet. No significant coverage by reliable sources, not even an IMDb listing (generally a step toward notability, but having a page on IMDb is not automatic notability). You can request for the article to be userfied so you can recreate the article at a time where its notability is heightened. I suggest reading Wikipedia's guideline on notability for more detail. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 11:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.