Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hamsters

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep (bad faith nomination) (non-admin closure). Pablo Talk | Contributions 19:02, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The_Hamsters

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/The Hamsters
The_Hamsters (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non-notable artist. No reliable sources are referenced to prove notability. The existing references only link to the band's own pages and the article sounds more like a promo or advert KennethStein 18:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment: This is not a bad faith nomination. I truly believe this band is non-notable. It doesn't meet a single point of the 12 set forth in WP:MUSIC. If it does, and that reference can be verified. Feel free to add it and I'll publicly change my opinion. Additionally, the article was written by the band's webmaster. KennethStein 18:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is a bad faith nomination by an editor who I instigated an AFD on. The Hamsters article exceeds the criteria required by WP:MUSIC by quite a margin. The band's been together for 20 years, are continually on tour and have performed more than 3,500 show under their own name. They have released 9 Albums and 4 DVDs (as the article states). Please close this inappropriate AFD forthwith. WebHamster 18:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy close, bad faith nomination by sockpuppet master out for revenge. Corvus cornix 18:47, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep, bad faith nomination, obviously passes WP:MUSIC. ugen64 18:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Question. Which one of the 12 criteria for notability in WP:MUSIC does this non-notable band meet? KennethStein 18:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment This article is lacking independent sources. Bad-faith nom or not, that needs to be changed... — Scientizzle 18:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.