Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Guvnor Mickey Francis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 22:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Guvnor Mickey Francis

The Guvnor Mickey Francis (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Deletion nomination. Non-notable professional wrestler. No evidence that this person passes WP:N and other relevent guidelines (either WP:BIO or WP:FICT depending on your point of view). Jayron32.talk.contribs 20:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

in all fairness, in North West England, Guv is pretty well known, with high attendance shows, and he is currently a double champion. he deserves the page, trust me! JS2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Save Us.JS2 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Despite his supposed celebrity status, searching Google News Archive produces a single article from the Gloucestershire Echo naming him along with several other wrestlers. Confusingly, NewsUK does turn up reviews of a book called Guvnors by one Mickey Francis, but the book is about football hooliganism, the reviews don't say that its author is a wrestler, and the ages of the two men don't match. The wrestler's bio page calls Guvnors his favourite book, so it's possible he took his nickname from the book written by his namesake. EALacey (talk) 21:12, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

the guvnor is on his way to popularity and should be in mind for the catagory of pro wrestler in england this page was made to help him the UK Pitbulls are 2 wrestlers that work for him and are pro they wrestle in NWE and you were right on all points but please realize that most ppl wanna see this page he deserves one ill take him out of the catagory but i wont delete this please understand he will be pro soon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.171.171 (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.