Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Zapruder Film Hoax

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge/redirect. W.marsh 00:31, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Great Zapruder Film Hoax

The Great Zapruder Film Hoax (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable conspiracy theory book. Article reads like an advertisement and makes no claim to notability. Amazon.com sales rank is greater than 286,000 [1] and the title only generates about 750 google hits [2] GabrielF 21:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep or merge. Though I strongly disagree with its conclusions, it is a book by a notable author from a significant publisher which has been reviewed in mainstream publications such as Publisher's Weekly. Gamaliel 21:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Fetzer. Not all of these books need an article, but Fetzer is notable.--Rosicrucian 23:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Fetzer. Crockspot 00:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Fetzer same as other book, the article has no content on its own, may as well help support the Fetzer article. --NuclearZer0 21:31, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Fetzer. Edison 01:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per above. Brimba 05:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
• delete man, fetzer is is a prodigious creator of non-notable conspiracy cruft. No need to boost his nonsense with added google hits. --Tbeatty 06:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Next he'll uncover the "truth" about the Easter Bunny and Santa. Morton Devonshire^Yo 08:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
• Merge Into James Fetzer.--MONGO 09:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - I went ahead and beefed up the publications section of the Fetzer article, to include pretty much all of his Amazon hits. (The guy has written a LOT of books!). There's really not anything else to merge from these book articles, unless you count the book cover graphics. - Crockspot 01:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Fetzer - JungleCat talk/contrib 13:28, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This book can be mentioned in the James Fetzer article, but does not merit its own article. --Aude (talk) 02:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.