Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Grammar of the Hype

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 07:57, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] The Grammar of the Hype

Someone's dissertation. Not notable. Vanity - partly written in first person. Delete CLW 22:34, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable book promotion Fsdfs 23:32, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as above, plus fails to meet criterion of being at least minimally comprehensible. Hopefully the dissertation itself reads less like a Babelfish translation. Do not redirect to Hype. Tonywalton  | Talk 00:05, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete NN --Rogerd 02:57, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as original research. (Third sentence "My thesis...") MCB 06:47, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete // Fred-Chess 10:28, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.