The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Seems to just be vanity about the author's company. TomTheHand 18:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete pretty non-notable company and defimitely vanity
Delete does not assert notability; reads like an advertisement/vanity. ikh (talk) 18:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete as advertisement and non-notabilty. --Ed (Edgar181) 19:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom --- MrDolomite 21:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. --Brad101 22:12, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.