Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Garcia Twins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per consensus. At the moment the twins are in the same position as any sportsperson whose talent has been recognised and has been taken on to develop. If they make the grade, fine, then the article may be recreated but at present they are not notable. TerriersFan 01:07, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Garcia Twins

Vanity of twin models "currently signed to World Wrestling Entertainment training in their developmental facility" `'Míkka 21:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

• delete - no notability asserted. Mukadderat 02:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per lack of notability Corpx 04:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• dont Deleate they are WWE Divas — 121.219.251.181 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Keep Tis true. They recently hired these two ladies and they are currently learning to take small bumps down in FCW. Падший ангел 21:33, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep They were in the Diva Search, and they're going to be in the WWE Divas 2007 Magazine. AquariusBoy01 11 August 2007
• Delete, as long as they haven't made the cut at WWE developmental and get some mainstream air time, they will remain unnotable. Future possible notability doesn't count.--Atlan (talk) 23:14, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, I agree with Atlan, until they do not get some airtime on WWE TV they will remain unnotable. There is lack of information about them to make an article about them Art 281 23:47, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:N and WP:V, as there are no reliable sources cited that significantly discuss the subject to evidence notability. -- But|seriously|folks  06:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep The were in the Diva Search, they are in the 2007 Divas magazine- User:Spike7000
• Delete, per lack of notability. RabidWolf 20:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Very STRONG KEEP Diva Search. Divas Magazine. WWE. Wrestlers. FSW. Etc. Heck, they are more notable than 80% of the pornstar pages on here. The Rypcord. 03:16, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. Please take a look at the article before closing the debate. They may have partipated in the 2006 Diva Search, but they didn't even make the top 8. The Divas Magazine apparently isn't notable enough for its own article, and this year's issue didn't come out until today. They were recently hired and are still in training. Thanks. -- But|seriously|folks  17:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. DrWarpMind 18:02, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Nikki311 18:04, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete just like every male who's had a developmental contract but not called up to the main roster. having a Developmental deal doesn't in itself make you notable, you'd have to do more - not making the cut for the 2006 Diva search doesn't sound like it's enough for notability MPJ-DK 18:57, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for now - recreate if they debut in FCW. Davnel03 19:16, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and salt per nomination. Burntsauce 20:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.