Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Emancipation of Jonny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 04:04, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Emancipation of Jonny

The Emancipation of Jonny (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Deleted through WP:PROD and recreated. This is a future film--no IMDB entry, no sources cited, article is vague. Probably too early for an article on this one. Chick Bowen 21:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, also violates WP:NOR -- Monty845 21:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as crystalbalism. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 21:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Acalamari 20:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
• Don't Delete - This film has been credited on the Imdb.com site, and even though the information is currently limited, there is so need to delete it. Wikipedia holds several hundreds of articles based on forthcoming films, what's the point of deleting this one if it is indeed correct????? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.142.59.181 (talk • contribs).
  • IMDB has a title only--no info. It hardly constitutes a reliable source for the article. Chick Bowen 00:55, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • I think that was a keep Garrie 04:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Garrie 04:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Come back when it's being publicised so you have some sources.Garrie 04:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.