Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Drowned Baby Timeline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Johnny Pez, if you want to move this to your userspace, you are welcome to send a request on my talk page (or to that of any other admin), and I'll be glad to do it. Deathphoenix ʕ 06:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Drowned Baby Timeline

this article is non-notable fanfiction ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 15:06, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, non-notable usenet cruft, and vanity. See [1], [2]. — Feb. 26, '06 [15:08] <freakofnur_xture|talk>
• Delete nn. --Terence Ong 15:27, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. —ERcheck @ 17:08, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Alternate history scenarios are already in wikipedia. -- Freemarket 17:29, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy to User:Johnny Pez's space. Fairly well-written, so hesitant to delete outright, but non-notable and vanity, so it shouldn't be in the main namespace. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 19:26, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy per LV Schizombie 22:29, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy. Interesting enough, but works "published" on usenet are not notable. Herostratus 04:27, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per freakofnurture, above Tom Harrison ^Talk 15:13, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as vanicruft. Why userfy this? Wikipedia is not a free host, blog, or webspace provider. -- Krash (Talk) 15:22, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Well written and presented, and an interesting read to boot; but ultimately, not something that belongs in an encyclopaedia. --PeruvianLlama^(spit) 18:36, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination --Splette 01:05, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Very interesting to read but not encyclopedic. --Valentinian ^(talk) 20:28, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.