The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.—Quarl(talk) 2007-02-13 22:44Z
Apart from the problems with NPOV and style, which could be corrected), this band seem not notable. The only reference to it (not by themselves) is two lines in a review of a whole festival. Goochelaar 10:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete per nom; no evidence of notability; no coverage by external independent sources. External links to their MySpace and YouTube are not sufficient to demonstrate notability. Walton monarchist89 11:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. Inkpaduta 20:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.