Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dawn and Drew Show

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Owen× ☎ 19:17, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] The Dawn and Drew Show

This is drivel. A vanity page that is completely biased and basically just an advertisement for the show.

• Strong keep The Dawn and Drew Show is one of the most popular podcasts in the world (source: ranking at Podcast Alley, currently at no. 7 out of 10276), and was recently featured on Fox 6 News [1]. The way we deal with biased articles is that we fix the bias, not that we delete articles. Is this AfD nomination a part of the recent GNAA trolling campaign against podcast articles? Haakon 12:21, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I recently added its importance to the article (the same fact noted above by Haakon) after spotting it on that list that's being kept. (It did lack info about its importance before then, I'll give it that.) I don't think all of the nominations are bad ones, but with Daily Source Code and this one I highly doubt you'll get it through. PS: please sign your noms. (By the way, check out the history of podcasting and you will see that both this podcast and the [{Daily Source Code]] figure heavily in it.) Jacqui^★ 19:37, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Very notable podcast, no evidence given that it was created as a vanity page. Factitious 21:58, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep notable podcast. non-drivel. Jessamyn 01:44, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

Comment Notability per, for example, the San Francisco Bay Guardian "One of the most popular podcasts nationally is the Dawn and Drew Show" [2]

• Strong keep This is relevent information; as noted above "The way we deal with biased articles is that we fix the bias, not that we delete articles." Nonperturbative 04:30, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.